Worker's Compensation News

Workers' Compensation Lien Recovery

The Supreme Court of Indiana issued a decision in the case of Depuy v. Farmer, 847 NE 2d 160 (Ind. 2006) in which the lien and subrogation provisions of I.C. 22-3-2-13 have been amended and/or clarified. Traditionally, I.C. 22-3-2-13 has universally been applied to terminate all workers' compensation benefits in the event of a third party settlement. In the Depuy case, the Indiana Supreme Court has limited the employer’s right to terminate benefits in the event of a third-party claim. The Supreme Court has suggested, but NOT RULED that when a third-party settlement is obtained before a workers' compensation claim has been resolved, and is in an amount less than the anticipated workers' compensation benefit, than the third-party settlement may not operate as a bar to the payment of future workers' compensation benefits.


Indiana Self-Insurers Association, Inc. - June 2012 Seminar


For a claim to be compensable, there must have been a personal injury or death arising out of and in the course of the employment. The arising out of test requires a causal connection between the employment and the injury and that causal connection is established or defeated by a consideration of the various risks involved. The case law generally identifies classes of risks, as follows:

  1. Personal Risk - Injuries which are caused by personal risks only are not compensable.
  2. Employment Risk - Injuries which are caused by employment risks only are compensable.
  3. Neutral Risk - Injuries which are proven to have no particular relationship to either a personal risk or an employment risk, but are in the course of the employment, are compensable pursuant to the positional risk doctrine.
  4. Combined Risk - Injuries which contain elements of risk referable to both the employee and the employer are compensable, provided that the employment risk contributes to the injury.


8440 Allison Pointe Blvd
Suite 350
Indianapolis, IN 46250